For now I only have one row with simmetry to reduce part count. I think the problem here is that simmetry only shares 2 or 3 decimals of precision, making precise part placement difficult

Bug Rejected Found in 0.6.7.2
Sandbox View

4 Comments

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    Dev Pedro

    @AndrewGarrison what I mean is that the part should be simmetric respect the axis even with the deformation

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @pedro16797 Mirror symmetry appears to keep the small strut positioned correctly against the fuel tank. I can see with radial symmetry how it floats away from (or goes inside of) the fuel tank and does not look correct. This is because the fuel tank is non-uniformly scaled at the top so it tapers differently. Changing the fuel tank to have a top scale of 8x8 or 9x9 and the strut positions correctly against its surface with all radial symmetry modes.

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    Dev Pedro

    @AndrewGarrison but I was using mirror simmetry and the part should be simmetric

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    The fuel tank you are connecting to has a non-uniform size at the top. Screenshot. Unfortunately, radial symmetry cannot work around a fuel tank that is non-uniformly scaled like that.

    6.2 years ago

No Upvotes

Log in in to upvote this post.