The very first spaceX mockup prototype starship landed today! Go spaceX! Go starship! Well, not so fast. It exploded minutes after launch. It's a step in the right direction!


13 Comments

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    11.4k Chtite451SR2

    @Tweedle_Aerospace lol ik

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Chtite451SR2 I also said Soace Shuttle

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.4k Chtite451SR2

    @CELESTIAL1 yep
    Starship #3 gone boom lol

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.4k Chtite451SR2

    @Tweedle_Aerospace you made a typo that made it a bad word lol

    Even after engine shu(now edited)t down

    (i didnt say that mods lol)

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Chtite451SR2 Yeah, I didn't realize that it exploded until now! Rest in peace.

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Chtite451SR2 @YaMomzBox420 hopefully we find out soon. But I do agree with the valve theory. That was my first though. I believe that after the second to last and last engine shutdown one of them had damage in the explosion of fuel in the preburner. Even after engine shut down small amounts of liquid methane continue to burn in the combustion chamber which makes that flame you see every time. If the pre burner possibly ignited the fuel because of a spark or something due to the lack of fuel oiling it. This would cause an explosion to happen deep inside of the combustion chamber possibly leading to this. This is why the Space Shuttle still had small amounts of fuel left before the final engine shutdown. Fuel could properly keep the engines cleaned out the entire time. This is a lot more common in closed combustion as the fuel isn’t escaping through the nozzle.

    +2 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,176 YaMomzBox420

    @Chtite451SR2 well, I'm no expert, but it might have been for safety. There's some talk online about the possibility of valve failure in the vents during landing. If so, then the remaining fuel would cook off and increase the tank pressure making it unsafe to approach for any workers. Without a functioning pressure release, the safest thing to do is just blow it up. Which also burns off any remaining fuel in the process. I recall something about SpaceX installing a "self destruct" module the other day too, so it makes sense.

    Also, it could've just been too much pressure like a dropped soda can. IDK

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.4k Chtite451SR2

    @Tweedle_Aerospace idk... why would they do it anyway?

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Chtite451SR2 I mean it landed. Who is to say that it wasn’t a rapid scheduled disassembly?

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.4k Chtite451SR2

    @YaMomzBox420 lol

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,176 YaMomzBox420

    @Chtite451SR2 Yes, RIP SN10

    Good thing SN 15 is right around the corner (literally and figuratively)

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.4k Chtite451SR2

    R.I.P SN10

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.4k Chtite451SR2

    yep
    until it RUD after landing... i was still right lol
    i guessed once again (correctly), that it would RUD

    +1 3.7 years ago

1 Upvote

Log in in to upvote this post.