@PaooX was a great guy who visits moons. But sadly I think he was banned for no reason. Tell me why he was banned.

Tags
Off Topic

Comments

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @sflanker and also if you were underaged and you were on mobile, you were trying to download a large part count craft that requires an account, what would you do?

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @BmnkRocketIndustries, please learn from this post.

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @SRMforever ok

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,138 SRM01

    @pianoAerospace but i think i will make

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @SRMforever but he is banned

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,138 SRM01

    @pianoAerospace i think we need to create something to commemorate PaooX

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @SRMforever

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @SpaceSharkie201 lol

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Don’t follow me it’s kinda creepy

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @SpaceSharkie201 lol

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    I need to know more because that’s ridiculous

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @SpaceSharkie201 if you are 12 years old, you will still be banned.

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Does it matter if you’re 1 year off?

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @Staticalliam7 yes

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,539 vghfr

    Sucks but it’s the law unfortunately

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @DrexxVolv Me too.

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,732 neodynamic

    @pianoplanepianorocket Yeah, I understand.

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @DrexxVolv Yeah. It make me sad too. But the reason I wrote this post is to just see the reason why he is banned.

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @sflanker Yeah, on the 3. one it said:
    You must be at 13 yeas old in the US or 13 to 16 years old in the EU. If PaooX did not read that Agreement, he might be banned.

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @sflanker Did read it before.

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    Mod sflanker

    @pianoplanepianorocket either did not read or disregarded, and then it was disclosed somehow that they were under the age limit, thus the site moderators gained actual knowledge that a child under 13 was using the site and were forced to act in accordance with the law.

    For the record: https://www.simplerockets.com/About/Terms

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @sflanker You are only able to use this website if you are 13 years older. So PaooX did not read the Terms Of Use while he created his account.

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,392 PZLAgencies

    @sflanker Ok. Thank you.

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    Mod sflanker

    @pianoplanepianorocket DrexxVolv is correct, this account was banned because it was being used by a child under the minimum age required by law in some countries (including the United States apparently).

    To better understand the legal liability that this site, and other online services, face when it comes to accounts created or accessed by children you can view the FTC's COPPA Frequently Asked Questions:

    The Rule also applies to operators of general audience websites or online services with actual knowledge that they are collecting, using, or disclosing personal information from children under 13, and to websites or online services that have actual knowledge that they are collecting personal information directly from users of another website or online service directed to children. Operators covered by the Rule must:

    1. Post a clear and comprehensive online privacy policy describing their information practices for personal information collected online from children;
    2. Provide direct notice to parents and obtain verifiable parental consent, with limited exceptions, before collecting personal information online from children;
    3. Give parents the choice of consenting to the operator’s collection and internal use of a child’s information, but prohibiting the operator from disclosing that information to third parties (unless disclosure is integral to the site or service, in which case, this must be made clear to parents);
    4. Provide parents access to their child's personal information to review and/or have the information deleted;
    5. Give parents the opportunity to prevent further use or online collection of a child's personal information;

    Unfortunately these guidelines make it basically impossible to create a website that is legally accessible to children under 13 because it would require positively identifying their parents, obtaining the required consent, and providing the required access control. Given that all most websites like this one know about their users is an email address, positively identifying parents is a completely unrealistic requirement. Also note that part 2 of "The Rule" literally creates a Catch 22: how can you identify a minor's parents prior to collecting any personal information from them. If you are an adult and think this results in an unfair limitation of children's access to social and educational websites like this one, then I suggest you 1) contact your U.S. representatives and tell them to reform COPPA to place responsibility for controlling children's access on parents not on service providers, and 2) vote Libertarian in the next election.

    These views are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of other moderators or Jundroo.

    +6 3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,732 neodynamic

    Underaged. These types of posts make me sorta sad.

    +1 3.3 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments

No Upvotes

Log in in to upvote this post.