Also the mirror tool can be more of a hindrance than a help. This can stop you adding more unique details. It could be useful to add the mirror part tool from sp.
@JVGG ok it honestly confuses me I tried building and found the mirroring tool never worked at all in addition when I did (finally) get it right it mirrored the wrong way, personally the simple planes mirror tools work much better.
@Axartar you always can select the root and break symmetry, pd breaking symmetry is not implicate deleting symmetric part that you have added before
@pedro16797 ah thank you and also mirroring branches can be annoying if you want an non-symmetrical rocket thanks though!
@Axartar Actually (for me) The Editor is Better than SP
but the Nodes wasnt
@Axartar Yes, you can type the values :/ And the mirror tool only duplicates the branch you have selected
Oh and as for functions unlike sp in sr2 (this may be me being stupid) you can’t input values e.g width=1.25 (not xml) and the drag expand tool can feel clumsy or imprecise @pedro16797
The main issue is the lack of versatility with it as the mirror tool in sr2 duplicates everything@pedro16797
Train in SR2 boi
You'll use the control properly as long as you play it
What functions are you talking about? Abou the mirror tool, I use it a lot of times and I don't see any problem, how is the sp better than this one?
@JVGG ok Example:1 I want to mirror off something that isn't fuselage, Example:2 I only want to mirror a part (Not big issue right click) and example:3 Mirror doesnt work so you end up using Rotary (I cant remember name) 2, which ends up all wrong