I'd like to make a quick poll to see how many of you guys use it.
The poll can be found here: Straw Poll


I'd like to know what you guys think about it in the comments below.
I myself don't really like them, and I think that multi-nozzle RCS would work better for certain stuff.

Tags
Question

14 Comments

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    22 Orbit

    i would like to have multi-nozzle

    +3 4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,458 crowxe

    I like but I don't use it with any vizzy controlled craft.

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,630 DeboStreams

    I personally use McRCS by @McLovinSpace

    +1 4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,278 Pjork

    @AndrewGarrison I do not wish for it to be removed but for a new static system to be implemented when the time is possible

    +1 4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    I just don't like the idea of gimbaling RCS. There's actually no point doing that. Big Rocket Engines has big nozzles which you really can't carry more than one per a combustion chamber and you don't need that much time-precise control, thus gimbal. In RCSs case their nozzle is measured in a few centimeters (shorter than your finger!) and they have to be controlled precisely, thus multi-nozzle. Even in case of Orion's LAS attitude control motors they decided not to rotate their solid attitude control rocket but to have multiple nozzles

    +1 4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    i tried it a couple times on docking satellites, and couldnt figure out how to control it. eventually changed it to the 5 fixed nozzle assemblies, and that worked alot more accurate

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Bravith98

    In my opinion I do not use it is not so accurate to attach , an improvement would be good

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    I didn't realize that the MD RCS wasn't working well for players. It would be helpful to get some links to crafts that demonstrate the MD RCS working poorly.

    +8 4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    514 OldCoach

    I agree , the multi RCS doesn't work well. With them I get out of control spin and excessive fuel use. I make RCS blocks with the regular nozzles and they work well.

    +1 4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    I like the look of the multi RSC better than regular RCS, but I find that using the multi RCS causes me to get stuck in an endless spin that I can’t get out of. What I like to do is have deactivated multi RCS on of the regular RCS. I like the idea of the multi-nozzle RCS, and I think they should share a similar model as the multi RCS, meaning they have actual nozzles. So to answer the question, no I don’t use them, at least not for their intended purpose. @Mod

    +1 4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Manually in short bursts they works well....
    Clickey

    +1 4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,278 Pjork

    All I would ever use them for is forward facing thrusters or small lander engines

    +1 4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    lol I'm just making RCS block with RocketEngines using Vizzy or InputController

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    No, it works terribly, better off just making your own RCS blocks

    +2 4.9 years ago

8 Upvotes

Log in in to upvote this post.