17 Comments

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    one year ago
  • Profile image
    14.2k FalconAero

    @AramL OK

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.7k AramL

    @FalconAero no

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.2k FalconAero

    @AramL excuse my are you Chinese 請問你是中國人嗎

    3.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    棒棒哒

    +1 4.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,910 SouthNoel

    @sujun 这种人才可不止他一个...很多地方随处可以见,向外佬问中文...

    +2 4.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.7k AramL

    @charles007 是的,但仅英语和西班牙语 >>> <<<

    4.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.4k Sibonitro

    @charles007 。。。。这国外网站你你问q群?

    4.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    有交流群吗?谢谢

    +2 4.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,923 Mikel8

    Good work !
    But
    I wanted to do it first . 😭

    +1 4.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,167 4di

    Amazing tutorial :)

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,458 crowxe

    @AnotherFireFox oh my , I always thought those things go with more than initial 2G. Thanks

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @crowxe I mean max TWR, not initial TWR. Space Shuttle irl has something like 1.2 initial TWR and has 3 max.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,458 crowxe

    @AnotherFireFox but 3G already means 3 TWR which is way higher than most well build SR2 rockets

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Physically, higher TWR means higher efficiency to orbit, because of low gravity loss. However this is dV-wise thing, not fuel-efficiency thing. If you define efficiency by fuel consumption efficiency per thrust, Isp is the only scale.

    If you wanna put any astronauts onborad, you wouldn't want to accelerate more than 4.0 - early rockets had something like 9G, but modern ones usually have 3G.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.7k AramL

    @crowxe I agree 1.10 is way too low but I did this part of the video a long time ago I forgot

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,458 crowxe

    This needs to go in a new section that I've been asking for, players notes and tips. Good one but the TWR vs. Efficiency is opposite to my finding , a 2.5 TWR was more fuel efficient than a 2 & 1.5 TWR rockets.
    Proof : my last craft (3 identical rockets except for TWR and engines mass) running the same vizzy program

    4.8 years ago

24 Upvotes

Log in in to upvote this post.