Auto Credit Based on Hoshimiya's Dartmoor ES ADTV 0G4X

Caelum 16 3X80

Family: 3rd Generation Processor
Architecture: Dartmoor
Process technology: AN4nmG2
Base Frequency: 2.5GHz
Boost Frequency: 5.7GHz
Max Frequency with HyperBoost: 5.9GHz
Core: 16
Thread: 32
HyperThread4x: 64Threads
Caches: 128MB+256MB 3DCache
Memory Support: DDR5-7200
PCIe Support: PCIe5.0 48Channels
TDP: 95w
Max Power Consumption Under HyperBoost 250w
Socket: Ar2
Chipset Support: B340, B350MX, G370, X390, X390MX
MSRP: $829

Socket Ar2

Caelum 16 3X80 Decap view

ES VERSION OR UNBOXED VERSION

GENERAL INFO

  • Predecessor: Dartmoor ES ADTV 0G4X
  • Created On: Windows
  • Game Version: 0.9.924.0
  • Price: $201k
  • Number of Parts: 10896
  • Dimensions: 2 m x 7 m x 7 m

PERFORMANCE

  • Total Delta V: 0m/s
  • Total Thrust: 0N
  • Engines: 0
  • Wet Mass: 26,172kg
  • Dry Mass: 26,172kg

STAGES

Stage Engines Delta V Thrust Burn Mass

9 Comments

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @Arctico

    Caelum has 384mb cache while 5995wx has 292mb cache

    Caelum has a base clock speed of 2.5 while 5995wx has 2.7 but Caelum can have clock speeds up to 5.7 while 5995wx can only reach 4.5 without overclocking

    one of the big differences is cores, 5995wx has 64 cores and Caelum has 16

    other big difference is threads, 5995wx has 128 threads and Caelum has 32

    Caelum supports DDR5-7200 ram and 5995wx supports DDR4-3200 rams

    5995wx draws 280w power and Caelum just needs 250w

    lastly, 5995wx costs thousands of dollars (up do 6500 dollars according to google) while Caelum costs 829 dollars which is still expensive but its a good price for its speed

    if this cpu was real and i was building a pc i would buy it instead of 5995wx

    +1 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,490 Hoshimiya

    @AsrielDreemurr1832 Maybe... but they are Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and 5995WX

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    this is almost stronger and faster than ryzen threadripper pro 3559x and its 3rd gen

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Arctico you could probably remove 10k redundant parts thats for sure

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    7meter cpu wow thats one big cpu, i dont think you can fit this in any motherboard

    +1 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,490 Hoshimiya

    @DrooMulticompany If a CPU can connect to motherboard by wireless connection, that can reduce the parts number significantly.

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,623 DMCcorp

    are there not ways to, like, decrease the part count by a lot while preserving quality

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TronicOrbital no

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    why do you always want to destroy my tablet...

    +2 1.9 years ago

14 Upvotes

Log in in to upvote this post.