F-XX

@SmurfResearchX I have to improve the missile firing, because they're a disaster, But it's mostly over.

@LoboindustriesAerospace - nice, it still has some power left! - the design is clean, and looks like a near future fighter

@SmurfResearchX Balance weight and reduce the power of the engines because it is like a high power fireworks rocket, when lowering the power became more stable, when you put maximum speed you must deploy the vertical fins, and fly under the 20,000 ft more of that is unstable by reducing pressure.

@SmurfResearchX dihedral not exactly I think . Or is it ,, remember paper airplane. And wing high in rear but slanting done to nose , only fashion paper airplane.. like that.. lift to body.. I use strips .. I have to show you my exact . You can see some what I do in numbers on wings , like 1 instead of 0

@SmurfResearchX have at it.. your version sounds way better.. I couldn't fix it in any short time, if I remember ..

@XionmassResearchDevt - the single delta wing without a horizontal stablizer is hard to balance, do you mean a built in AOA or dihedral angle - i think the double flap(like the seperate airbrakes on each wing of the B-2) could be an option also...fun to dial in to work though

@XionmassResearchDevt You just told me the fault, I'm going to correct it to see if I can get a steady flight.

I just checked it out, it can't work unless you tinker mass in rear, need more nose weight.. also. Your center of lift is to far back, hence the flat spins.. to.... longer nose or smaller rear wings

My experience with rear Delta wings, your going to have issues making this exact design work

@SmurfResearchX hi That plane doesn't fly, or good if it flies but earth planet style, on its own axis, I don't know that this stable, does not take off, only explodes elegantly