Help!!!

I may actually keep this design so stay tuned

@SmurfResearchX oops

|
|
V

I’ve decided to scrap this in favor for a new and simpler design (coming tomorrow along with the name)

@Freeskyareospace - the "rocket" configuration will control pitch and yaw with combined autopilot slider settings(0-100) for proportional, integral, and derivative sliders combined - then the "plane" configuration has seperate pid controls for pitch and roll - it does get tricky with spaceplanes/ssto... but i think it works best with rocket configuration, with yaw control being pretty necessary for space/vacuum controls - if you highlight the pid settings, it will show how each slider affects the response from the auto pilot

@SmurfResearchX do I set it to rocket or airplane? Is there something more specific?

@Freeskyareospace yes and what smurf says is completely true to. All can take part

it could be auto pilot settings - flying in atmosphere with control surfaces usually needs a low derivative setting...and space/vacuum rocket engine controls need a higher derivative setting - sometimes its hard to tune settings that will work for both

So the pixie engine has a higher gimbal range? I was using rcs but it is probably too weak. @XionmassResearchDevt

Another, more to rear the gimbal / pixie engine will give more control, and idk if your useing rcs

I'll look at it. I'm not sure, but without looking. I use pixies for the gimbal . Turn it up and max out the pixies. That's one suggestion