Auto Credit Based on FuelsRHeavyRocketLiteTIME's Tall or Terrible Rocket


Tall or Terrible Rocket 2


Version 2 should be much better TWR and has more fuel after orbit is locked. Same tanks different setup and stages.



Activation Groups and Controls


AG1 : Kerolox Boosters

AG2 : Metholox Boosters

AG3 : Hydrolox Boosters

AG6 : Parachutes

AG9 : Solar Panels

AG10 : RCS



Warnings


Fly EAST or North May be low fuel after orbit.



Additional Links


Links to other 3 Stage Rockets no Lander:

Easy Galactic Arsenal HMK Simple VAC 2 Sat Orbit Hop

Easy Galactic Arsenal HMK Simple Orbit Hop SeaorSurf

Tall or Terrible Rocket

Tall or Terrible Rocket 2

Big Rock Star with the ISS Core 8 Side Thrusters and 12 SRBs



GENERAL INFO

  • Predecessor: Tall or Terrible Rocket
  • Created On: Windows
  • Game Version: 0.9.802.0
  • Price: $1,617,393k
  • Number of Parts: 365
  • Dimensions: 226 m x 40 m x 40 m

PERFORMANCE

  • Total Delta V: 11.9km/s
  • Total Thrust: 407.5MN
  • Engines: 120
  • Wet Mass: 1.68E+7kg
  • Dry Mass: 1.05E+6kg

STAGES

Stage Engines Delta V Thrust Burn Mass
1 48 3.1km/s 303.8MN 1.7m 1.68E+7kg
4 69 8.9km/s 103.7MN 2.8m 4.88E+6kg

9 Comments

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    32.0k Zyvx

    @FuelsRHeavyRocketLiteTIME I have seen the stuff you mentioned in SR2, I can't remember who made each, but I'm so glad they did make them, so I don't have to, lol

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Zyvx My stuff amazing lol the way you create stuff I wonder if anyone has ever asked you to create a HUD display for monitoring the craft you create or an MFD that could monitor vitals on any craft. I know I'm probably just dreaming or thinking of maybe modding something that is already out there.

    +1 2.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.0k Zyvx

    I had a fun voyage with this rocket, it's definitely fuel efficient, nice work

    2.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    ah

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SamTheFox
    Well if you look actually
    It's not much but quite a bit actually.
    First Stage is the same Second Stage kinda got doubled and put on the side of Stage 3 which of course had to get taller itself to help with better aerodynamics when launching from the surface to gain orbit.
    After that I had to add landing legs because it was having issues in different RSS Systems and Locations.
    Made sure all detachment forces were better and that's how this version got here.

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    what changed

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @NebulaSpaceAgency Thanks it was a switch up in the fuel tanks that were from the original build. I wondered if it would make a difference if I cut a tall rocket in half

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SamtheFox Okay Now... it should be okay...lol

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    for its size, it’s very fuel inefficient

    2.8 years ago

3 Upvotes

Log in in to upvote this post.