Auto Credit Based on CentaurAerospace's [RSS] LCUS/Sail Block-A Upper Stage
*Can only be used normally in RSS environment
Introduction to the craft:
The first stage of the LPE-V carrier rocket uses two FE-7 engines and is equipped with the latest upper stage LCUS Sail Block-A upper stage of the Sail series. It can be configured with 0, 2, or 4 LRSB-24 solid boosters, or with a universal core stage to form a CBC configuration
How to use:
*When launching, a sufficiently large and flat launch site is required. I recommend using the CSC LC-2 launch site that I have created
Press AG 1 and follow the prompts to enter the numerical value (I suggest setting the Heading to 90 , but you can also choose other angles). After confirming the correctness of the values, press AG 1 again to enter the T-15s state. After that, do not activate any grading or activation groups until reaching the Second Stage Engine Cut Off-3. According to the program load, it will enter the orbit. Due to my poor programming ability, there may be significant errors, but I have done my best to correct it. Enjoy the launch process and wait for SECO-3 before operating the vehicle freely.
Activation group:
AG 1:Auto Launch Program
AG 2: LCUS RCS
AG 9: Solar panel
AG 10: Satellite RCS
This is my longest and most invested work, I hope you like it
GENERAL INFO
- Predecessor: [RSS] LCUS/Sail Block-A Upper Stage
- Created On: Windows
- Game Version: 1.3.116.0
- Price: $-20,291,275k
- Number of Parts: 13443
- Dimensions: 66 m x 30 m x 19 m
PERFORMANCE
- Total Delta V: 49.5km/s
- Total Thrust: 10.2MN
- Engines: 36
- Wet Mass: 1.47E+6kg
- Dry Mass: 5.62E+5kg
STAGES
Stage | Engines | Delta V | Thrust | Burn | Mass |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 2 | 590m/s | 3.0MN | 4.3m | 1.47E+6kg |
4 | 2 | 191m/s | 4.4MN | 60s | 1.47E+6kg |
6 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 2.81E+5kg |
9 | 6 | 19m/s | 111kN | 7s | 42,925kg |
10 | 1 | 48.7km/s | 286kN | 28.8m | 42,925kg |
12 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 29,807kg |
Comments
36 Upvotes
Log in in to upvote this post.
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace Sorry for getting back to you so late
I think the first thing to consider is what kind of rocket you want to make next, such as reusable rockets or disposable rockets. Then, what are your requirements for the performance of this rocket, such as LEO capacity, GEO capacity, and so on. According to performance requirements, different stages of fuel and engines can be matched, and additional structural details such as separation rockets, reinforcement ribs, and electrical interfaces can be added on top of these. I usually conceptualize my new rocket based on this idea.
@CentaurAerospace hey do you have any ideas for my next rocket
@CentaurAerospace hey it’s OK. At least you still have your main rocket to make you feel better. We can have two rockets one for me and one for you, right
@CentaurAerospace nice :D
@FalconAero ?
佬,高攀不起
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace 7000p HERE
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace I tried my best to lower it to 7000p, but I can't make it any lower. To be honest, in order to reduce it to 7000p, I deleted many details that I had been working on for several months, which made me very unhappy, but I hope you can play it now. It really moves me to see that you like this rocket and patiently communicate your needs with me. Thank you.
@CentaurAerospace well can you? Do it and then send me the link I would recommend you get it down to 7000 or 6000 parts 8000 is a bit too much for my iPad
@XRS2200 @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace I will try my best to remove some parts that will not greatly affect the appearance, and see if the number of parts can be lower
@CentaurAerospace can you just remove anything that unnecessary because I tried and tried on my iPad, but my iPad does not seem to want to do it
@CentaurAerospace that must have taken so much work! 5k parts alone is complex, never mind removing that many from a 13k part build. The part count is mind-boggling!
@CentaurAerospace tysm! :D
@CentaurAerospace yeah right😁
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace Good luck with your iPad😂
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace 8000 may be feasible, I will try to remove more things tomorrow. If it's lower, I might have to dismantle the LCUS flight controller
@CentaurAerospace I’m just trying to figure out how to get my iPad to run it
@CentaurAerospace Hey mind, would you get it down to like 6000 parts? Is it possible?
@CentaurAerospace yay now I can fly your vehicle
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace @XRS2200 here
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace @XRS2200 Good news! I successfully lowered it to 8500p
I deleted some cables and first level flight control from LCUS, and even with some modified tower structures, it only costs around 8500p!
I will upload it soon!
@CentaurAerospace I use your label pack and you said in the label pack that one label equals one part 234 I don’t remember removing some labels would be improving performance right?
@CentaurAerospace get what
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace Get