Auto Credit Based on CentaurAerospace's [RSS] LCUS/Sail Block-A Upper Stage
Introduction to the craft:
The first stage of the LPE-V carrier rocket uses two FE-7 engines and is equipped with the latest upper stage LCUS Sail Block-A upper stage of the Sail series. It can be configured with 0, 2, or 4 LRSB-24 solid boosters, or with a universal core stage to form a CBC configuration
How to use:
*When launching, a sufficiently large and flat launch site is required. I recommend using the CSC LC-2 launch site that I have created
Press AG 1 and follow the prompts to enter the numerical value (I suggest setting the Heading to 90 , but you can also choose other angles). After confirming the correctness of the values, press AG 1 again to enter the T-15s state. After that, do not activate any grading or activation groups until reaching the Second Stage Engine Cut Off-3. According to the program load, it will enter the orbit. Due to my poor programming ability, there may be significant errors, but I have done my best to correct it. Enjoy the launch process and wait for SECO-3 before operating the vehicle freely.
Activation group:
AG 1:Auto Launch Program
AG 2: LCUS RCS
AG 9: Solar panel
AG 10: Satellite RCS
This is my longest and most invested work, I hope you like it
GENERAL INFO
- Predecessor: [RSS] LCUS/Sail Block-A Upper Stage
- Created On: Windows
- Game Version: 1.3.116.0
- Price: $-20,291,275k
- Number of Parts: 13443
- Dimensions: 66 m x 30 m x 19 m
PERFORMANCE
- Total Delta V: 49.5km/s
- Total Thrust: 10.2MN
- Engines: 36
- Wet Mass: 1.47E+6kg
- Dry Mass: 5.62E+5kg
STAGES
| Stage | Engines | Delta V | Thrust | Burn | Mass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 590m/s | 3.0MN | 4.3m | 1.47E+6kg |
| 4 | 2 | 191m/s | 4.4MN | 60s | 1.47E+6kg |
| 6 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 2.81E+5kg |
| 9 | 6 | 19m/s | 111kN | 7s | 42,925kg |
| 10 | 1 | 48.7km/s | 286kN | 28.8m | 42,925kg |
| 12 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 29,807kg |
Comments
36 Upvotes
Log in in to upvote this post.
ata
@CentaurAerospace hey it’s OK. At least you still have your main rocket to make you feel better. We can have two rockets one for me and one for you, right
@CentaurAerospace nice :D
@FalconAero ？
佬，高攀不起
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace 7000p HERE
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace I tried my best to lower it to 7000p, but I can't make it any lower. To be honest, in order to reduce it to 7000p, I deleted many details that I had been working on for several months, which made me very unhappy, but I hope you can play it now. It really moves me to see that you like this rocket and patiently communicate your needs with me. Thank you.
@CentaurAerospace well can you? Do it and then send me the link I would recommend you get it down to 7000 or 6000 parts 8000 is a bit too much for my iPad
@XRS2200 @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace I will try my best to remove some parts that will not greatly affect the appearance, and see if the number of parts can be lower
@CentaurAerospace can you just remove anything that unnecessary because I tried and tried on my iPad, but my iPad does not seem to want to do it
@CentaurAerospace that must have taken so much work! 5k parts alone is complex, never mind removing that many from a 13k part build. The part count is mind-boggling!
@CentaurAerospace tysm! :D
@CentaurAerospace yeah right😁
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace Good luck with your iPad😂
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace 8000 may be feasible, I will try to remove more things tomorrow. If it's lower, I might have to dismantle the LCUS flight controller
@CentaurAerospace I’m just trying to figure out how to get my iPad to run it
@CentaurAerospace Hey mind, would you get it down to like 6000 parts? Is it possible?
@CentaurAerospace yay now I can fly your vehicle
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace @XRS2200 here
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace @XRS2200 Good news! I successfully lowered it to 8500p
I deleted some cables and first level flight control from LCUS, and even with some modified tower structures, it only costs around 8500p!
I will upload it soon!
@CentaurAerospace I use your label pack and you said in the label pack that one label equals one part 234 I don’t remember removing some labels would be improving performance right?
@CentaurAerospace get what
@ColumbiaHavenXAerospace Get
So other than those, yes@CentaurAerospace