Auto Credit Based on CentaurAerospace's [RSS] LCUS/Sail Block-A Upper Stage

*Can only be used normally in RSS environment


Introduction to the craft:

The first stage of the LPE-V carrier rocket uses two FE-7 engines and is equipped with the latest upper stage LCUS Sail Block-A upper stage of the Sail series. It can be configured with 0, 2, or 4 LRSB-24 solid boosters, or with a universal core stage to form a CBC configuration

How to use:

*When launching, a sufficiently large and flat launch site is required. I recommend using the CSC LC-2 launch site that I have created


Press AG 1 and follow the prompts to enter the numerical value (I suggest setting the Heading to 90 , but you can also choose other angles). After confirming the correctness of the values, press AG 1 again to enter the T-15s state. After that, do not activate any grading or activation groups until reaching the Second Stage Engine Cut Off-3. According to the program load, it will enter the orbit. Due to my poor programming ability, there may be significant errors, but I have done my best to correct it. Enjoy the launch process and wait for SECO-3 before operating the vehicle freely.

Activation group:

AG 1:Auto Launch Program
AG 2: LCUS RCS
AG 9: Solar panel
AG 10: Satellite RCS

This is my longest and most invested work, I hope you like it

piFp6hT.png

GENERAL INFO

PERFORMANCE

  • Total Delta V: 49.5km/s
  • Total Thrust: 10.2MN
  • Engines: 36
  • Wet Mass: 1.47E+6kg
  • Dry Mass: 5.62E+5kg

STAGES

Stage Engines Delta V Thrust Burn Mass
2 2 590m/s 3.0MN 4.3m 1.47E+6kg
4 2 191m/s 4.4MN 60s 1.47E+6kg
6 0 0m/s 0N 0s 2.81E+5kg
9 6 19m/s 111kN 7s 42,925kg
10 1 48.7km/s 286kN 28.8m 42,925kg
12 0 0m/s 0N 0s 29,807kg

Comments

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    I suggest setting AP to>=500km, PE to>=150km, and Heading to 90 ° when inputting data, as this will provide a better transmission experience

    Pinned 6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace Sorry for getting back to you so late
    I think the first thing to consider is what kind of rocket you want to make next, such as reusable rockets or disposable rockets. Then, what are your requirements for the performance of this rocket, such as LEO capacity, GEO capacity, and so on. According to performance requirements, different stages of fuel and engines can be matched, and additional structural details such as separation rockets, reinforcement ribs, and electrical interfaces can be added on top of these. I usually conceptualize my new rocket based on this idea.

    14 days ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace hey do you have any ideas for my next rocket

    23 days ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace hey it’s OK. At least you still have your main rocket to make you feel better. We can have two rockets one for me and one for you, right

    +1 6 months ago
  • Profile image
    907 Skye93

    @CentaurAerospace nice :D

    +1 6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @FalconAero ?

    6 months ago
  • Profile image
    14.2k FalconAero

    佬,高攀不起

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace 7000p HERE

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace I tried my best to lower it to 7000p, but I can't make it any lower. To be honest, in order to reduce it to 7000p, I deleted many details that I had been working on for several months, which made me very unhappy, but I hope you can play it now. It really moves me to see that you like this rocket and patiently communicate your needs with me. Thank you.

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace well can you? Do it and then send me the link I would recommend you get it down to 7000 or 6000 parts 8000 is a bit too much for my iPad

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @XRS2200 @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace I will try my best to remove some parts that will not greatly affect the appearance, and see if the number of parts can be lower

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace can you just remove anything that unnecessary because I tried and tried on my iPad, but my iPad does not seem to want to do it

    6 months ago
  • Profile image
    907 Skye93

    @CentaurAerospace that must have taken so much work! 5k parts alone is complex, never mind removing that many from a 13k part build. The part count is mind-boggling!

    6 months ago
  • Profile image
    907 Skye93

    @CentaurAerospace tysm! :D

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace yeah right😁

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace Good luck with your iPad😂

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace 8000 may be feasible, I will try to remove more things tomorrow. If it's lower, I might have to dismantle the LCUS flight controller

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace I’m just trying to figure out how to get my iPad to run it

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace Hey mind, would you get it down to like 6000 parts? Is it possible?

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace yay now I can fly your vehicle

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace @XRS2200 here

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace @XRS2200 Good news! I successfully lowered it to 8500p
    I deleted some cables and first level flight control from LCUS, and even with some modified tower structures, it only costs around 8500p!
    I will upload it soon!

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace I use your label pack and you said in the label pack that one label equals one part 234 I don’t remember removing some labels would be improving performance right?

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @CentaurAerospace get what

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ColumbiaHavenXAerospace Get

    6 months ago
  • Log in to see more comments

36 Upvotes

Log in in to upvote this post.