TVC

@Samps0n well the us doctrine is more focused on bvr, low observeability . and not maneuverability.
a tailplane is better suited for stealth that is really it.
and the su34 is a 4th gen, there is one dodging a couple patriots on youtube. the canards and the overall design being more focused on agility helped it dodge those missiles.

@Samps0n droo com links is a communications mod for Juno.
it makes communications between crafts possible using antennas lsuch as parabolic, dipole etc
basically it makes non drood manned crafts non functional because they need require antennas.
it is cool but limited.
well a mod isn't really as polished as stock elements and it doesn't really give off that native to the game feel.

Those are good answers , ones I hadn’t considered. What is the USA so without canards? They aren’t but on the most recent rendition of Russia’s 5 th(?) generation.(f-34, halfback or fulback) Is 5th or 6th gen supposed to be stealth, even if only able to keep a missile from locking , which is what I have been led to believe that is the only stealth advantage the USA has currently, I think x-band but maybe it was k-band , radar confusion, I can’t even see how I would have a foundation for this story to be something that falsely recalled is nil.

What’s ’droo com links’?
How did a mod take from the game if the game wanted to embrace it? Isn’t a mod just an unauthorised part? I am not a no-it-all or anything, my experience is from an Apple phone user only. I have been hopeful there will be a jailbreak way to access them one day. As is 20% of my phone is this game, 1400 dl’s and the sandbox’s and the memories . I wouldn’t even consider deleting any of it, god knows I wouldn’t be happy to go through the archive again.

@TritonAerospace I agree with you

@Periodic yeah i feel you.
it would be awesome had they added this to the stock game.
a mod i feel the same about is "droo com links" mod aswell.

This mod ruined a great opportunity for an addition to the game. 😠

@Samps0n yeah this craft has a thrust vectoring mod.

@Samps0n i think the eu has a delta canard design primarily due to its compactness and high aoa capabilities. most delta canards are cheaper to operate than usa fighters aswell.
yeah I've seen alot of canard crafts laately.
also a canard is a little bit more responsive than a taileron.
it is like a front wheel drive kinda thing

Mods? Does it have a cockpit?

I always wondered why you never see usa fighters with canards and you never eu fighters without them, I get the big difference being that we don't have the specialist ‘intercepter’,mostly cus flying bombers over the usa is ridiculous, as would sending them to eu citys, but the intermediate missile ban, made that different. But I don't see what role a canard would benefit interceptors, is there anything I haven't considered that would matter? By that logic you would think they need turn that aren't as tight. On a separate note have you noticed that jno builders build an inordinate amount of delta wing? (it has a canard connection, not complete gooblygack) I ask because your opinion holds weight as a guy that has balanced some interesting planes, I loved the one where tou turn off the fly by wire, the autopulot, if you will, and it instantly is like a flying brick. You couldn't of wrote an essay and been as crystal clear!

I was thinking, by your reasoning, to get you to stick around, I (or someone ) need only make requests of you, and then hopefully your a morale lawyer ( Noone has seen one of those even in the sandbox🤣)