• Profile image

    @SmurfResearchX thanks for answer. Just to be clear, I'm using a real solar system, so the earth I "real dimension", not droo.

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @YaMomzBox420 thanks for your answer. But the situation is a bit different.
    In my situation i have an upepr stage with a DV of 4100 m/s in LEO and a burn time of (let's say) 10 minutes. In the MAP mode, when planning an auto-burn, i select my DV of 3.5 km/s to reach escape velocity; so the burn duration increase, but when planning it increase more then the real stage burn time. It is as the AI cannot calulate precisely how long will the burn last, and so the precision of burn result in a LOW precision, both in planning and practically when performing it.

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Insanity thanks. I'm sure I'd does not line up with energy consumption. With a number of around 80 I get an energy consumption of 20.9kw. I don't know How to check torque and how to link it to rocket or spacecraft steering.
    However, thanks for tour answer.
    Maybe the developer will once Give a look at this post and answer

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Arstotzka thanks, that is almost the way I do it. But I am wondering if there is a more "scientific and predictable" way to do it..

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Tweedle_Aerospace so, tell me if I'm right. On a first stage powered flight you will rely on engine gimbal long, right? For upper atmosphere and space on gimbal, rcs, and for small weight, on gyros right?
    However, the number that indicates the power of gyro, I. E. 89/100%, or 150/100% that means power of gyro adn battery usage, has a meaning? I mean is it possible to link the power of gyro or the battery usage to something that tells me how much power or battery I will need for a given spacecraft? Is it MW or something else? Thanks in advance

    3.9 years ago