This probably wont even be seen, but my opinion says DEFINETLY rename it, ever since I started playing a few years back, I thought to myself that this looks nothing like SimpleRockets, and is not a prequel/sequel to it either, so why name it after it?
One final note is that top speed DOES MATTER, ALOT, i tried going with blasto inferno 2, a random car i saw, and it hit a top speed of 93m/s, it was stable and easy to control, which made it easy to finish the course, but it did it in 2 Minutes and 24 seconds, way way slower than cars with high top speed such as velocity speedtail and the FS-RST, more important than speed is handling of course 😅
oh and by the way, the velocity speedtail could have done better, i oversteered it at one point (runway junction) and had to make an extra turn to correct it, which added like 4 seconds
Velocity Grand Sport - 1m 53s (Top Speed achieved : 166m/s)
Velocity Speedtail - 1m 45s (Top Speed achieved : 196m/s, which it reached in like 11 frickin seconds)
its actually strange how speedtail won, yes its faster, but grand sport is more track focused for turns, speedtail is built for straight line speed, seems like 1:45 is the fastest on that list, too 🤨
Simply, More Mass = More Gravity
More Gravity = More Velocity During Flyby
Flying By Closer To The Celestial Body Gives The Most Velocity Possible In A Flyby
Luna Isnt the best when it comes to flybys, but if you do want to use it, try being as close as possible to earn the most velocity.
This is without a doubt the most useful thing i've ever seen, definitely gonna level up my crafts after this, THANK YOU!
+2 7 months agostay strong buddy, covid is nothing but a flu wannabe (personal experience)
2.4 years agothat cockpit is nuts, ill be waiting for the full release
+1 2.4 years agoits great
2.4 years agoo7
2.4 years agoInteresting...
2.4 years agoface with raised eyebrow
+1 2.4 years ago@OverCAT oh and can you check my newest craft? im trying out a new style here, feedback appreciated
you dont have to if you dont want to 😅
+1 2.4 years ago@OverCAT Its up to you either ways :)
2.4 years agoThis probably wont even be seen, but my opinion says DEFINETLY rename it, ever since I started playing a few years back, I thought to myself that this looks nothing like SimpleRockets, and is not a prequel/sequel to it either, so why name it after it?
+1 2.4 years ago@Freeskyaerospace i think this track balanced both, i would love a handling focused track + top speed track is just going through a runway
2.4 years agoOne final note is that top speed DOES MATTER, ALOT, i tried going with blasto inferno 2, a random car i saw, and it hit a top speed of 93m/s, it was stable and easy to control, which made it easy to finish the course, but it did it in 2 Minutes and 24 seconds, way way slower than cars with high top speed such as velocity speedtail and the FS-RST, more important than speed is handling of course 😅
2.4 years agooh and by the way, the velocity speedtail could have done better, i oversteered it at one point (runway junction) and had to make an extra turn to correct it, which added like 4 seconds
but the velocity grand sport run was flawless
2.4 years agoVelocity Grand Sport - 1m 53s (Top Speed achieved : 166m/s)
Velocity Speedtail - 1m 45s (Top Speed achieved : 196m/s, which it reached in like 11 frickin seconds)
its actually strange how speedtail won, yes its faster, but grand sport is more track focused for turns, speedtail is built for straight line speed, seems like 1:45 is the fastest on that list, too 🤨
2.4 years ago@InTheHorizonRocketLabs literally any rocket thats automated, like fully automated, its satisfying yet impressive 👌
2.4 years agoDefinetly Rocket.
2.4 years ago@TronicOrbital Will do, im going to release a video & the craft itself very soon :)
+1 2.4 years agocan relate to the third one 😅
3.1 years agoyeah that happened yesterday (GMT+4), thought it was something with my wifi till i saw this post
3.1 years ago@AR3SZX straight to the point, with no hesitation
+2 3.1 years agoCongrats To You Both @Mostly , @InfinityTechnology !
You will both make the community a better place for sure, i know it.
3.1 years ago@XLAerospace0378 1 word, epic.
3.1 years agoLooks Is an instant 10/10
9/10 For performance doe
3.1 years ago@Chtite451SR2 😳
3.1 years ago@Chtite451SR2 Thanks for this idea :)
3.1 years agoRemoval would cause chaos tbh, if you're facing a hard time with this, try editing it, the XML way
3.1 years ago@LaunchDepartmentAerospace No, Thank YOU
+1 3.1 years ago@LaunchDepartmentAerospace not really the best at making aircrafts, but ill give it a go.
+1 3.1 years agoremoval would cause chaos, extending it is fine
xml exists aswell
3.1 years agoholy jundroo that looks so clean
+1 3.1 years agoSimply, More Mass = More Gravity
More Gravity = More Velocity During Flyby
Flying By Closer To The Celestial Body Gives The Most Velocity Possible In A Flyby
Luna Isnt the best when it comes to flybys, but if you do want to use it, try being as close as possible to earn the most velocity.
3.1 years agoApplied, I Would'nt say im best, but this is a cool responsibility for a game i've been playing since 2019 :)
3.1 years agoTest
+1 3.2 years ago