• Profile image

    @yopo it's just that @AnotherFireFox wants to explore the possibility of making a mod about this, but we have to wait until the devs release the mod tools
    And I answered @Kell because he said ComplexRockets, and that's the name of our modding group

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PlanesofJundroo nah np, Solid Rocket Booster. So you can only control direction with rcs or reaction wheels and you can't throttle

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Shoot2kill I've seen people uploading crafts but no sandboxes

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @NathanMikeska I got it to work without a command pod but just with part modifier attributes

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox Now I know the tech, Making it in Droo and stock system was the first step, next is Cylero, and then RSS

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KraZIvan I don't know the details, you should ask @AndrewGarrison

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @RogueSteward if you want me to notice your answer you should tag me in the message, it's clear enough in FAQ as @SupremeDorian pointed

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Kell AFF wants to make a mod about this, but we have to wait until mod tools are released

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    [text](link) for clickable links
    ![text](image link) for images (doesn't work in comments)

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    I think that this has been suggested before, both fuel generators, ground bases and science experiments

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    They've answered this a lot of times and it's getting frustrating. You have a FAQ button where they clearly say it's going to be made.

    I think it's clear that they're working hard on the game and they have to make a solid game before going through the process of adapting the UI for mobiles and porting everything.

    We don't have mod tools or the planet builder yet and those are main features of the game, so keep calm and stop the speculations, the mobile version is going to be released sooner or later and the PC version too (because you have to remember this is a early access in Steam right now, not a full game)

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Ehelium2 hahahaha "release"
    With an average of 4 hours of sleep time

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Chancey21 sometimes you want to post 5 crafts in the same day and then none in a month because they're part of the same project

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AndrewGarrison sorry, the hype 🙈

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PhilipTarpley you've made my live much easier now, I didn't notice that the pin worked even if you change views

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    F

    @nico412 don't think so, he has almost 2 times my points hahahaha

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KraZIvan :)
    There is a 4th method but it's almost the same than 2. Going to the steam browser and searching it there, then pressing the download buttom

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    F

    :( Hope to see you back soon, I'm going to miss your crafts

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AndrewGarrison hm, after testing it I think I can confirm that the auto-burn tends to overshoot and I think it's due to the spooling time.
    Also, after testing this I've realised how much we need the planed burn window in the Flight View but I don't think you have to rush this for 0.7.0, so I'm going to wait until release to report it

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    I dont have time to test it right now, but does the auto-burn feature take the spooling time into account? @AndrewGarrison

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox but engine response time. They were fast with that feature, I'm more than happy. The de-nerf option may imply changing the whole engine code

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox And also I want to make collaborations to spread the use of xml and I like the idea od challenging players

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox because it's not an easy one. It has 6 SRBs with different thrusts that detatch in different times, you have to change throttle in the MaxQ and then you separate the fairing, that represents a big portion of the mass

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Bmcclory the thing is with automation the game doesn't let you know the dV from the designer easily and I don't have time to test it myself, so this is why the challenge exists and why there's a reward

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MarioG I can make you an engine to land Droo on Luna

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @tars13 HAHSHSHSHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KraZIvan I would love to make more videos and not just the BFR one, but my laptop sucks, and since I work on long projects the game evolves and I start from scratch every time

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox oh, de-nerf, i thought you were asking for even more nerf

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KraZIvan nice to hear that :)

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    If the example is hard to replicate you can make it easier through xml

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @tars13 what I mean is that it's going to be even more amazing

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    The new exhaust looks amazing, the possibilities that the nozzle opens are huge, thanks for everything @NathanMikeska @AndrewGarrison and all the team :)

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @QuickNils just read the last message

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox that's the same thing @Mod said hahaha

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Kell Sadly :(

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AndrewGarrison I love the idea of the gimballed rcs, I think multi-nozzle rcs fit better the diy part of the game or at least the subassembly part of it.
    About the subassembly parts packs we're making can you make it so the subassembly folder can read from folders inside? Now we have to put the parts directly into the subassemblies folder and it gets messy, being able to place, imagine, SpaceX Engines in a folder called that can be very helpful for us :)

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AndrewGarrison and about RCS presets, what do you think about adding RCS blocks that are really multiple parts and not a dedicated one. Like the part packs we're making

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AndrewGarrison I was going to make my own ones (adding a rcs nozzle with 1e-3 thrust and taking the output as the controller for an engine) but if you add rcs option to any engine that won't be necessary.
    If you add that option you may be able to get rid of current RCS and just make it a preset, but for easy use thay may mean that engine attachments should work like rcs ones, being able to attach to any surface and I don't know if you want that.

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox I will love to see you reaching Mach 25 on the StratoSphere, I'm sure you have to hit escape velocity of Earth or something like that because of how thin the atmosphere is

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    What was 8? What do you mean with 17?
    For 14 I would say 30MPa and for 15 add that higher max values too.
    If I remember it right 12 is already a thing.
    I like this post more than the other hahahaha no more nerfing :P

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox In this game Mach is Mach, not like in other games :). In Earth's orbit you have Mach 0. Mach 25 is a vertical reentry at really huge speeds.

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Pejayous just the beta version, you have to go and validate beta testing

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Kell hm, that's actually a good idea but how do you would implement that? This way we will have to add 100% efficiency engines for RSS, that won't change automatically

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Kell I think this is a duplicated message

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Kell YESSSS PLEASE! i don't want to see Kell suffering from notstockache. Como to the dark side of the xml muahahaha

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AndrewGarrison I think this is not important enough to be a suggestion or a bug so I'll say it here.
    The crew cabin is too small, I've never cared about it but now that you can see the size of the pilot it's weird to see the head and the feet stick out.
    Why not making the default radius 2m instead of 1.6? Or even a bit bigger to fit the dummy

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AndrewGarrison I'm glad to read this. Personally I think 0.7 needs a long beta testing period (I'm happy you released now) because it's too important. I think this will be one of the most important updates for the game ever (with the planet builder one). Keep this great work, and ask for anything you need :)

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox @Mostly @PorkyClown3 @Bmcclory I've updated the challenge to make it more clear

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AndrewGarrison that's another good solution, yes. The warp can end up with the same problem I had with the warp drive having too much acceleration for the game ticks

    +1 5.7 years ago