I'd recommend giving the payload a chip so that it can run the programme for you. In order to execute the programme, I would check if the craft weight falls below a certain threshold, such as falling to 1 050 kg if your payload ways 1 000 kg.
According to the Post Formatting Guide, images are formed as so:
In order to use your own images, you'll need to upload them online.
In oder to make them clickable, do the following:
[](target url)
@67milo well, that was not implied in your post or comments.
If you want a true binary system, there's nothing you can do, but I believe there are suggestions for that. If you want to approximate a binary, you can place a dark barycentre as the actual, then orbit it with two planets that glow really brightly. The anamorphic flares arise naturally out of the stars' overexposed textures, but the lens flare will not appear.
@67milo yes, and you can make that the star. You can change its colour, its gravity, and its size. The latter two from PS, the former from System Editor.
With the way stars work in this game, you can edit them just fine.
@cyberport26 I haven't found a craft that can chip switch, nor have I found a part property that allows such a function. Best you can do is program the non-player-controlled chip, then assign parts of the craft to be controlled by that chip to allow for independent function.
I found it. You need the craft ID to get it to work. You should find (craft ID of []) in CRAFT INFORMATION. Type a name, and it should spit out an ID you can switch to. The craft probably needs to be loaded, otherwise the programme will not work.
You want AGL => 1000. Setting it equal means that the programme is looking for 1000.000..., a value that almost never is logged because of the limited refresh rate of JNO.
@Spitty with how far apart stars are, the map might get completely screwed up due to precision loss at immense distances from the origin. I got this to happen by teleporting an obscene distance upwards, and the map got jittery to the point that the icon representing the player craft was warping in and out of visibility.
This might also apply to planets themselves, but I have not tested that.
There are some role-play companies on this site, but they are rather rare, especially when compared to the early days. Meme builds are also not too common, but you do see rather unorthodox builds quite a bit, such as a flying house or an anime girl. Low effort posts are surprisingly uncommon, and many builds are cleverly optimised. There was a trend with Starships at some point, so you could probably find a lot of them.
Drama really doesn't happen here, and it almost always has been rather meagre.
As for aesthetic criticism, you definitely do need work in colour and fill consistency, and you would probably be better off trying to paint on the Hershey's Chocolate Bar rather than trying to avoid painting it at all. The lighting is also inconsistent; you show a crescent moon, but the planet is fully lit, as is the chocolate bar. It is also quite hard to read the title.
On the plus, you got the very annoying process of atmosphere shading down almost perfectly. When looking towards the edges of the disk, the oceans and land become gradually bluer and paler, blending in with the atmosphere, but not seamlessly so, establishing a definitive boundary whilst still giving the sky the volume it needs.
Overall, I'd rate it with a 0.65, which isn't bad for someone of your alleged inexperience.
I quite like it. Sure, my tablet isn't too powerful, but the limitations helped me find my style and aesthetic in my builds. I also learned a thing or two about optimisation.
The mods were unable to take away my illegitimate upvote points, meaning it probably wasn't them. We can see it, meaning it might not be a visual bug. Points don't go away when one receives an un-upvote (last I checked).
Spitballing as an idgit with no knowledge, something is probably wrong with the system itself. Would be funny if you got swapped with someone else with a similar name.
P.S.; saw this same thing happen to someone else. They think it is an upvote removal thing. Doesn't make sense, but here we are. Just upvoted and removed it, but your points didn't change.
@HumanoidCreature Ţ̶̞̣̳̩͔̭̬̘̰̫͕̞͓̀̌͊̓̀͌̏̄͋͂̍̈́͜͝h̷̳̙̺̜̭̼̻̋̔̓̒͜͝ͅi̶̮̣̩̠̯͙̙̎͋̄̓͋̾͆̔͝s̷̩̜̜̝͛͋̔͝ͅ ̵̯̺̙̻̟̯͓͉̟̠̼̠͎̊̔̓͋̒̔̍̀̆̓̅͘ͅḭ̴̛͙̹̽͆̓̍̎͐̈́͜s̷͇̘͖̟͎͔̣̩̘̹̣̣͓̙̞͂̈́̉́ ̴̢̨̡̛͇̬͍͍̘̱̟͙̤́̓̄̃̿̈́̆̑͒̚k̴̨̧̡̝̰͓͈̯͎̘͚͉̠̬̋̓́n̸͍͛̓̈̿̈̈͝o̸͔̣̘̰̮͇͍̖̭̟͍̝̿́̆̽̌̀́̆͋̂͂́́́̀͛͘ẅ̴̡̧̹͙̰͒̃̓͝ñ̶̨̮͉̞̖͍͎̦͈̬̽̑̈̆̊͐͂́͒̅̌̔ ̵̬͚̂̓͌̋ä̶̛͇̣̦̤̩̩̩͎͍̱̺̘̰̗̭̤́̃̀̔̏̈̏̊͌̕̚s̴̡̧̡͈̼̦̬̺̯͕̤̫̯̺̩̘̄̅̄̀̇̀ ̴̡̛̜̰͇͎͎͓̪͚͍͇̼̼̲̱͉͆̇̄͐̍̍̈́̈́̇̆͠͠z̷̨̿̀̂͊͂̔̎̽̐͆̐̄̚á̵̛̛̹̠̤̀̂̒̓̾̈́̈́́͊̇͘͠͠͝ĺ̵̨̧͕̤̥̱̤̤̘͉̗̻̇̅̉̽̄̒̀̓̐̊͊̚͘̕͜͝ģ̸̢̺͇̭̩̘͗͛͒̌̍́̌̽̐̾̀͜͜͠͝͝o̵̖̠̼͋̍̉͐̋̊͊͗̃̈́̊̐͊͊̑͝͝ ̷̢̱̖̝̽̀̄̏̉͋͛͊̉͌͘̚t̴̪̖̗̜͔̫̮͇̤͍̙͖̔̍͛̏̉̋͗̏̈́̃̉͘ͅͅe̶͚̥͆͛̊̉͒̌̈̊͛̆̑͘x̷̫͓̟͔̮̟̻̻͙̪͗̔́̔͊̿̊̿̑́̚͜͜͜͠t̴̡̡̲̗͗͌̊̉̌͐͛͗̕̚͘̕͝͝͝.̶̛̫̭̗͍͆̇̈͌̂̒͛͑̀̃́ ̸̞̟̠̙̩̰͗͐̑Y̴̛̰͈̣̬͓̺̝͈͉̥̗̞̥̫͠ơ̸̲̣͍̈͌͌̓̀̚u̵̢̟͈̳̯͖̹̭͇͓̟̪̱͎̱͓̘̐̐̒̋̊̊̓͘ ̴̧͔̭͈̙̈́̓̈́̅̊̓̍c̴̡̛̩̯̩͉͉͎̆̐͑̄̆a̴̧̗͕̬̘͖͉͍͓̬̤̟̯̽̐̽͋̎̐͗̅̇̈́͗̌͐͘̕̕͜͝n̸̥͎̑̍͋̎̃͌͊̅͐̅͠ ̵̨̨̢̤̠̭̠͈̩͎̜̟̪̩̒̈́̽͑̈́͐̅͜͝f̸̢̗̼̞͉̰͔͔͓̲̭͕͂̓̓͝i̴̺̱͇̠̞̮̤̤̜̋̍͂̐̂̊̈́̎̈́̿͗̿̆̑̆͝n̷̨̛͎̝̯̪̻͔̲̺͙̫͔̖̜̫̈́͛̓̿̏̒͒̄̑̃̋̂͘͘d̶̡̢̗̫͈̹̖̟͓͓̺͈͌̂̄̎̓̎͜͠͝ ̶̧̢́̅̀a̸͚̖͈͚̱͈̺̩̋͜͜ͅ ̷̦̤̰̺͎͇͓̃͋̿̂̏̀̽̅̅̈́̚g̸̤͎͉̜͚͊̋̾̽̄̐̅̄̍͗̀̽͘͠͠e̴̛͔̘̝͇̥̱̙̩͚̝͖̺̺̫̯̅̀̓̒̀͒̀͘͘͠͝n̸̲̬͇̫̖̞͆̈̈̈̅͌̈̑̍̇͝ḛ̶̮̼̂̎̎͐̅̓́̀͊̾̑̾̂͒̈́͘͜r̷̡̧͚̠͉̬̱͍̱̜͙̲̮̭̊͂̍͜͠͠a̵̢͖͙̻͈̞̙͂̽̀̃̇̓̈́̀͊̈́͒͐̚t̷̡̛̲̰̦̻̻̼̥̬̿͗̿̓̄̿́̈̒̋̽͌o̵̧̢̫̪̠̟̙̙̣̺͇̼͛̿̆̌ŗ̸͓̯͖̹͙̦̹̪͙͉͇̩̽̏̿̉̌̾͌̀̑ ̸̨̛̲͙̠̮̭̮̀͌̓͌́͊̀̔͘̕͜͠o̴̢̢̩̬̟̻̰͕̘͓̙̯̪͍̔͋̆͜ņ̶̯͖̥̳͉͑̐̄̒͒͌̃͜͝l̶͙̪̫̣͍̦̉́̈́̚i̴̢̡̦͍͉͔̯̐́̊̍̈́̌̓͗̌͊͂̾̾̇̕n̴͍͌͆̌̂̔ë̷͈̼̥͙͐͊́͂̉,̶͇̝͈̪͈̙̩̩̔̉͒̎̌̀̓̀́͠͝ ̶̠̱͌̈͛͂̔̃̅̾͒̓̆͜ş̸̛̛̠͍̖͈̲̭̙̱̭̻̮̝͕̝͉͌̈͆̌́̊̑́̓̔͌̽̏̕̚͜ų̸̛̛̦̟̰̠͈̟͍̖̣̣̽̂͐̈̄̌̋̿͘͜c̵̨̹̄ĥ̴̢̜̤̬͈̲̯̪̯͈̮͙͇̫̦̺͎̋͆͗̓̄ ̴̣̇͌̅̌́̈̎̎͒͑̽͋͂͘̚̚͝ä̶̛̛̳̹͍͙͔͖͙́͋̀̀͂̄̀̑̈́̈́̑̂͝s̵̖̬̳͍̺̞͎̊͐̈́͝ ̵͈̣̞̗̠̙̮̭̿̈́̃̈͆͛͐̐̕͜h̵͈̾̾̂̎̂̈́̀͊̽̐͐t̵̤͕̦͎̯̦̀̎̆̽̈̆͝t̷̡̝͚̞͔͙͍̦̠̽͆̆̒̓̅̌͗͘͝p̸̛̺̗̫͈̩̠͇̊̈́̈́̈́̊̉͋̉͘͠s̷̢͉͉̹̟̠̜͍̑̃̈̆̎́̀͑̄͑̑̀͆̀̔̊͜:̴̫͖̠̃̆/̸̠͎̥̃͛̑́̔̇͗͋̐͠͝͝ͅ/̷̛͔̠̠͔̻̐́̿̈́́̅̔̏̀̓̋̍̈́̃̚ͅw̴͕̫̫͔̤͈̥̣͔̤̺̼̃̒̉w̵͕̯͕͔͈̿͌̀̽͂̈̐̊̽͂̕w̴̧̡͉̖͕̰̥̣͔͕͇͌͐̽́͊̔̿̒̆̋͋̕͠͝.̵̫̰̥̆͘z̴̢͖̯̝̖̋̅̋̾̄͋̿̇̕ą̶͉̘̠͖͉̠̯̬̻̻̟͚̽͌̍̕̚l̴̖̍̐̆̎̅̓̔̀̒͑͊͌́̆̽͝g̸̢͙͇͉̱͇̞̠̠̱̓͌̀̊͜ͅǫ̸̡̖͔̺͎̱̼͍̘̖̃͐́ͅ.̷̛̺̳̳̦̺̜͎̮̺͉̣̠̠̼̘̮̥̋̌͂͆̀́͗̍͊̅̔̓͋̕͝o̷͖̘̯̭̲̰͖̭̲̜͍̟͊̋̈́͜r̸̳͓̫͉̙̗̱̭̜̗͕̫̪̔̄̐͋͊̋̀͠g̵̨͉̹̝̲̓̏͠/̸̮̜͈̞̮̮̬̆.̴͖̟̮̻̺̪̈̏̽̏͐͒͐͑̿͒͋ ̷̰̦̔̕H̸̢͉̪̠̬̫͕͗̓́͝a̸̤̽̂͛ͅͅv̶͈̝̦͚̳̯̖̗̱̾͗͛̕ḙ̵̡̧̧̨̗̮̯͈̻̮̗͔̥̒̿̋͊͘̚͜͝͠͝ ̵̧̺͈̰̫͍̌̄͛̇͋̒̆̀͂͗̽̆̎̿̕͝f̸̡̜̟͓͇̥͍̳̜̫̅͗ṵ̴̧̻̱͙͍͙̱̥̰̤̗̻͕̇̚͜ṋ̴͜͝.̴̡̲̥̻̫͖̘͙̗̰̼͆͒̋̌̂̍͐͌̃͜͝
one year agoI'd recommend giving the payload a chip so that it can run the programme for you. In order to execute the programme, I would check if the craft weight falls below a certain threshold, such as falling to 1 050 kg if your payload ways 1 000 kg.
one year agoI recognise this xD
one year agoWalking machine with inverse kinematics.
one year ago@Zenithspeed @StockPlanesRemastered
+2 one year agoEngine link
I don't believe so.
one year ago@StockPlanesRemastered with the proper coding, yes it can. If you'd like, I can create one for you to pick apart.
one year ago@StockPlanesRemastered a throttle inputController can be added to generators via Hidden Properties.
+1 one year ago@Majakalona that's fair enough, I guess
+1 one year ago@Majakalona I see. In my defence, I have seen that aspect ratio on powerful mobiles before.
+1 one year agoThat, and your crafts were made on Android.
Das Auto.
+1 one year agoHow are you playing this beta on an Android?
+1 one year agoAccording to the Post Formatting Guide, images are formed as so:
1.1 years ago
In order to use your own images, you'll need to upload them online.
In oder to make them clickable, do the following:
[](target url)
idc
+1 1.1 years ago@67milo well, that was not implied in your post or comments.
If you want a true binary system, there's nothing you can do, but I believe there are suggestions for that. If you want to approximate a binary, you can place a dark barycentre as the actual, then orbit it with two planets that glow really brightly. The anamorphic flares arise naturally out of the stars' overexposed textures, but the lens flare will not appear.
If you'd like, I can try making a system.
1.1 years ago@67milo yes, and you can make that the star. You can change its colour, its gravity, and its size. The latter two from PS, the former from System Editor.
With the way stars work in this game, you can edit them just fine.
1.1 years agoAlready a thing.
1.1 years agoThis is how you get points.
+5 1.1 years agoRest in peace. Try not to get eaten by the snake lady.
1.1 years ago@İnTeLoG VF-06I Yıldız is now ready. Enjoy)
1.1 years agoI'll see what I can do.
1.1 years agoPersonally, I see no problem with this. It's an unofficial expansion of the blog for our Russian friends.
+1 1.1 years agoNo
+1 1.1 years agoclicky link
+1 1.1 years agoHow is this in any way relevant to JNO?
1.2 years ago@cyberport26 I haven't found a craft that can chip switch, nor have I found a part property that allows such a function. Best you can do is program the non-player-controlled chip, then assign parts of the craft to be controlled by that chip to allow for independent function.
1.2 years agoBoo
1.2 years ago@cyberport26 WHAT
I found it. You need the craft ID to get it to work. You should find (craft ID of []) in CRAFT INFORMATION. Type a name, and it should spit out an ID you can switch to. The craft probably needs to be loaded, otherwise the programme will not work.
1.2 years agoThis is entirely possible.
+1 1.2 years agoYou might have seriously screwed up a part file, especially if you used Overload on it. I easily get that message when I delete a command chip.
1.2 years agoYou want AGL => 1000. Setting it equal means that the programme is looking for 1000.000..., a value that almost never is logged because of the limited refresh rate of JNO.
+1 1.2 years ago@Spitty with how far apart stars are, the map might get completely screwed up due to precision loss at immense distances from the origin. I got this to happen by teleporting an obscene distance upwards, and the map got jittery to the point that the icon representing the player craft was warping in and out of visibility.
This might also apply to planets themselves, but I have not tested that.
1.2 years agoCo-ordinate precision might prove problematic.
1.2 years agoUnfortunately, you can't use mods on Android or iOS.
1.2 years agoThere are some role-play companies on this site, but they are rather rare, especially when compared to the early days. Meme builds are also not too common, but you do see rather unorthodox builds quite a bit, such as a flying house or an anime girl. Low effort posts are surprisingly uncommon, and many builds are cleverly optimised. There was a trend with Starships at some point, so you could probably find a lot of them.
Drama really doesn't happen here, and it almost always has been rather meagre.
+1 1.2 years agoI tried to upload the void. Didn't work.
1.2 years agoYe
1.2 years ago:‘(
1.2 years ago@Hyperant I did read, hence my comment saying it's good for someone as inexperienced as yourself. Never meant to make you feel awkward.
1.2 years agoYum
As for aesthetic criticism, you definitely do need work in colour and fill consistency, and you would probably be better off trying to paint on the Hershey's Chocolate Bar rather than trying to avoid painting it at all. The lighting is also inconsistent; you show a crescent moon, but the planet is fully lit, as is the chocolate bar. It is also quite hard to read the title.
On the plus, you got the very annoying process of atmosphere shading down almost perfectly. When looking towards the edges of the disk, the oceans and land become gradually bluer and paler, blending in with the atmosphere, but not seamlessly so, establishing a definitive boundary whilst still giving the sky the volume it needs.
Overall, I'd rate it with a 0.65, which isn't bad for someone of your alleged inexperience.
1.2 years agoI quite like it. Sure, my tablet isn't too powerful, but the limitations helped me find my style and aesthetic in my builds. I also learned a thing or two about optimisation.
1.2 years agoOhoho, ominous!
+1 1.2 years agoVery wholesome off-topic post. Give her a big hug.
1.2 years agoAll you can do is rotate the bay.
1.3 years ago@Hyperant net positive = ":)"
1.3 years ago:)
1.3 years agoI'd just send a rocket on a suicide mission. Land a heavily shielded craft there, and bob around for a bit until you explode.
+1 1.3 years agoYikes. At least it was just a mirror.
+1 1.3 years agoThe mods were unable to take away my illegitimate upvote points, meaning it probably wasn't them. We can see it, meaning it might not be a visual bug. Points don't go away when one receives an un-upvote (last I checked).
Spitballing as an idgit with no knowledge, something is probably wrong with the system itself. Would be funny if you got swapped with someone else with a similar name.
P.S.; saw this same thing happen to someone else. They think it is an upvote removal thing. Doesn't make sense, but here we are. Just upvoted and removed it, but your points didn't change.
1.3 years ago@4drii neat!
+1 1.3 years ago