Also because they aren’t using metals for the body of it. Lots of details on the Starship are missing because it never has to go in the atmosphere after launch.
Where I live always feels like 10-12 degrees more than what the temperature is. Luckily I have air conditioning in school. But I have two sports and for most of last week I didn’t have drinkable water.
@DrexxVolv yes but it will still fall through the ground if suspended in the air. If it is caught by the launch pad craft than the only way to keep it there is to either dock it which takes forever or to set it down.
@sushiboi go to craft information in vizzy. You will see nav position. Drag that out. Then click on the drop down and then you will see pitch and drag.
@pianoplane wdym small rocket? Do you know what it takes to do that? The last time I did that it required a first stage bigger than the Saturn v and a nuclear stage the size of a small apartment building. And then it still needed a small pressure engine.
@TerTech it doesn’t matter if it had the off topic tag, there are still limits. The off topic is supposed to be for aerospace stuff that doesn’t pertain to SR2 specifically. Also if he served it well, he wouldn’t be under investigation for sexual harassment
@AshtvinayakAerospace tbh, NASA doesn’t seem to give up on anybody, look at Starliner, if Nauka hadn’t failed then Starliner would’ve failed. And yet they still are trying to launch Starliner as soon as it is ready and are still wanting it to become a crew launcher.
@AshtvinayakAerospace not entirely true. Every single one of their rockets has below 95% except GSLV Mk III which has 95.1%. The GSLV Mk I has the lowest of just 62%. Mk II has an 86%. And the PSLV has a 94%. Most of those being lower than any other active rocket in the world.
If ISRO doesn’t start picking up the pace while also getting more safety and reputation they will never be able to enter the heavy lift rocket race successfully. They have less than a 90% success rate compared to Space X, which has a 98.7% success rate on orbital launches. Only two complete failures. And the heaviest lift rocket can’t even carry half of what Space X does to LEO for almost the same price. So honestly I don’t see how they will make it out of light-medium launches. This isn’t meant to offend anybody but it is just the truth. This has a few days of research predating this launch and to be honest, all ISRO has going for it is cheapness in the smaller range of launches.
@jrzspace adding on to what @Chtite451SR2 said, you might want two that spin in opposite directions to counter the torque of the first one. Try putting them on opposite side is the boat instead of right behind each other for max efficiency.
Yes, especially Roku TVs.
3.3 years agoAlso because they aren’t using metals for the body of it. Lots of details on the Starship are missing because it never has to go in the atmosphere after launch.
3.3 years agoWhere I live always feels like 10-12 degrees more than what the temperature is. Luckily I have air conditioning in school. But I have two sports and for most of last week I didn’t have drinkable water.
3.3 years ago@INTERFARE cool
3.3 years ago@PanzerAerospace F
3.3 years ago@PanzerAerospace did you just get banned? All of the sudden U can’t click on you page.
3.3 years ago@PanzerAerospace I could agree with the part about pianoplane
3.4 years ago@DrexxVolv a catch mechanism is very hard to get lined up well.
3.4 years ago@pianoplane did you just laugh at the insult meant for you? Also what?
3.4 years ago@DrexxVolv yes but it will still fall through the ground if suspended in the air. If it is caught by the launch pad craft than the only way to keep it there is to either dock it which takes forever or to set it down.
3.4 years agoI think you explained it but I forgot
3.4 years agoHow does catch not delete the booster? Do you set the booster down before switching?
3.4 years ago@sushiboi then I can’t help you because that is just overly complicated and not really useful. It would take forever to explajn.
3.4 years ago@sushiboi go to craft information in vizzy. You will see nav position. Drag that out. Then click on the drop down and then you will see pitch and drag.
3.4 years ago@pianoplane you try making a “small” rocket that can go across the entire solar system and then I will consider joining
3.4 years agoBy getting the pitch and heading instead of the axis
3.4 years ago@pianoplane so? That is not breaking the rules. You are allowed to upvote whatever you want with no consequence.
3.4 years ago@pianoplane wdym small rocket? Do you know what it takes to do that? The last time I did that it required a first stage bigger than the Saturn v and a nuclear stage the size of a small apartment building. And then it still needed a small pressure engine.
3.4 years agoOr just Droo
3.4 years agoEvery single moon in the solar system?
3.4 years ago@Secondartilleryforce YouTube isn’t part of our community. He can post whatever he likes wherever he likes on his channel.
+2 3.4 years ago@pianoplane why? He technically hasn’t broken the rules that I am aware of.
3.4 years ago@pianoplane why do you ping someone in every post you make. It just annoys them.
+1 3.4 years ago@pianoplane upvote cults aren’t specifically against the rules as said in the post. But discouraged.
+2 3.4 years agoOk?
3.4 years agoYou are the best Starship maker.
3.4 years ago@Elga I wish lol
+1 3.4 years ago@TerTech it doesn’t matter if it had the off topic tag, there are still limits. The off topic is supposed to be for aerospace stuff that doesn’t pertain to SR2 specifically. Also if he served it well, he wouldn’t be under investigation for sexual harassment
3.4 years agoI am doing both. My school forgot to put me in a required class and now I have an extra hour and a half class next semester.
3.4 years agoWhy did you post this? This isn’t the place for politics and the horrible things some of them do. Also why does he get honor?
3.4 years ago@pianoplane than how did you get to forums?
3.4 years ago@pianoplane he did. He said open your eyes and go looks at the pinned formatting guide. Simple.
3.4 years ago@Elga ChuckSoyaa did this with thrust vectoring once, but that is the only one.
+1 3.4 years ago@DrexxVolv I wanna rock
+2 3.4 years agoThen eat more
+1 3.4 years agoIndeed
3.4 years agoNot pick up but researched and just extruding. To have that many soft bodies it would be crazy
3.4 years ago@AshtvinayakAerospace plus they have two years to figure out and fix the problems with all of their rockets and future rockets that will be active.
3.4 years ago@AshtvinayakAerospace tbh, NASA doesn’t seem to give up on anybody, look at Starliner, if Nauka hadn’t failed then Starliner would’ve failed. And yet they still are trying to launch Starliner as soon as it is ready and are still wanting it to become a crew launcher.
3.4 years ago@AshtvinayakAerospace not entirely true. Every single one of their rockets has below 95% except GSLV Mk III which has 95.1%. The GSLV Mk I has the lowest of just 62%. Mk II has an 86%. And the PSLV has a 94%. Most of those being lower than any other active rocket in the world.
3.4 years agoIf ISRO doesn’t start picking up the pace while also getting more safety and reputation they will never be able to enter the heavy lift rocket race successfully. They have less than a 90% success rate compared to Space X, which has a 98.7% success rate on orbital launches. Only two complete failures. And the heaviest lift rocket can’t even carry half of what Space X does to LEO for almost the same price. So honestly I don’t see how they will make it out of light-medium launches. This isn’t meant to offend anybody but it is just the truth. This has a few days of research predating this launch and to be honest, all ISRO has going for it is cheapness in the smaller range of launches.
+1 3.4 years ago@AshtvinayakAerospace no I am still in high school.
3.4 years ago@AshtvinayakAerospace I don’t study
3.4 years ago@ChinmayShukla oh they XML’ed a lot to do that
3.4 years ago@ChinmayShukla no. How would I? I don’t have anyway of seeing it. You need to give a link to it.
3.4 years ago@ChinmayShukla ?
3.4 years agoNot me
3.4 years agoOh no! Terminator is coming!
3.4 years ago@jrzspace adding on to what @Chtite451SR2 said, you might want two that spin in opposite directions to counter the torque of the first one. Try putting them on opposite side is the boat instead of right behind each other for max efficiency.
+2 3.4 years ago@RocketScienceCo always willing to give help to you
3.4 years ago