this is not accurate at all considering that each chip are not made equal. A Samsung Exynos 9611 would be way more powerful than a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 released in 2014. Yet both of those chipset would not even reach the same performance level of a Samsung Exynos 2100 or Snapdragon 888
.
usually, a good layman's way to understand how powerful a phone's chipset is by looking at the price (applicable to androids only as ALL new iPhones and iPads except for a few iPad series regardless of the price point would have the same chipset released alongside the latest generation) which means that a Samsung Galaxy A51 ($200~) would be way less powerful than a Samsung Galaxy S21 ($800-1000)
.
another way to understand the performance level would be by benchmarking using apps like antutu benchmark or geekbench 4. the higher the score, the better.
.
it's also better to understand the naming scheme of chipsets albeit research must be done to avoid confusion. For the Snapdragon, the Apple A and M series chips, the higher the number usually means better (Snapdragon 801 vs 888) or (Apple A6x vs A14 Bionic) while for Samsung's Exynos series, it's usually a bit more convoluted.
Nathan has a Samsung Galaxy S6, I have an S5 and Andrew is making sure that the SR2 is going to work on Nathan's phone.. that means, my S5 can run it well hopefully :0
official collaboration with a space agency? crazy
+9 1.6 years agoermm... what the derp???
1.9 years agoseek professional help
3.0 years agothis is not accurate at all considering that each chip are not made equal. A Samsung Exynos 9611 would be way more powerful than a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 released in 2014. Yet both of those chipset would not even reach the same performance level of a Samsung Exynos 2100 or Snapdragon 888
3.3 years ago.
usually, a good layman's way to understand how powerful a phone's chipset is by looking at the price (applicable to androids only as ALL new iPhones and iPads except for a few iPad series regardless of the price point would have the same chipset released alongside the latest generation) which means that a Samsung Galaxy A51 ($200~) would be way less powerful than a Samsung Galaxy S21 ($800-1000)
.
another way to understand the performance level would be by benchmarking using apps like antutu benchmark or geekbench 4. the higher the score, the better.
.
it's also better to understand the naming scheme of chipsets albeit research must be done to avoid confusion. For the Snapdragon, the Apple A and M series chips, the higher the number usually means better (Snapdragon 801 vs 888) or (Apple A6x vs A14 Bionic) while for Samsung's Exynos series, it's usually a bit more convoluted.
it's not a sin to do ANYTHING in this game. if you have to make it work, use all the tools given in the game
5.0 years agoyooo make a donut
5.0 years ago@Common the answer is still the same, you can't really use mods on iOS
5.1 years agoyeah cool
5.1 years agohey look! one of the module in the space station was made by me!
5.1 years ago@PorkyClown3 https://www.instagram.com/p/BfHmU79nUK6/?igshid=5uoylsivo3nn
5.1 years agoi think jundroo themselves made a video about this. i remembered it vividly
5.2 years ago@AnotherFireFox time to take it down i guess.
+1 5.8 years agodamn this means that i need to uldate my windows 7 to 64 bit
6.1 years agodamn can't wait for me to play this game on my bad pc
+1 6.1 years agooh god this is going to absolutely burn my S5
6.1 years agoNathan has a Samsung Galaxy S6, I have an S5 and Andrew is making sure that the SR2 is going to work on Nathan's phone.. that means, my S5 can run it well hopefully :0
6.7 years agoI see wings. Spaceplanes confirmed
+5 6.7 years ago@Bmcclory I believe not.
6.7 years agoThat landing is sexy. Also. Will drone/remote controlling stuff will be added?
6.8 years agoThat font looks wacky haha
+1 6.9 years ago@Planefun yeah. Sorta
6.9 years ago@Planefun yes
6.9 years agoCan a company work under NARET? If so, I’ll join!
6.9 years agoLogo looks very nice what do you think of mine and what does NARET mean?
6.9 years ago@Ryn176 in all honesty, facebook sucks.
6.9 years ago@Mymessage happy holidays to you!
6.9 years agoHey. I'm going to say sorry for what I replied to you on that anime thing in SP if it's a bit harsh. Sorry.
6.9 years agoPut in uservoice. One feature at a time yes?
6.9 years ago@Oski no
6.9 years ago@GINGER01 yes
6.9 years ago@AttestedArk @PorkyClown3 @AndrewGarrison thanks!
6.9 years agoSmearthians cosmonauts
6.9 years ago@AndrewGarrison here's the one that has the UserVoice linked with it.
6.9 years ago@AndrewGarrison ohh!
6.9 years ago@Tully2001 oh nooooooooooooo! Not that male from SW:R1
6.9 years ago@AndrewGarrison so, this idea will get used inside SR2 even though I didn't put this inside the UserVoice?
6.9 years ago@AndrewGarrison ah forgot about it. Thanks.
6.9 years agoThank you for the follow, kind sir.
6.9 years ago@Epicur I said I never saw the new one, I've watched rogue one though
6.9 years ago@Awsomur @Epicur actually. I have no idea about star wars. I've never watched the new one. I'm Just trolling. I guess this went wrong lol.
6.9 years ago@WOOPTYWOOP212 yeah! Thanks!
6.9 years ago@AndrewGarrison @Hellfirekoder
6.9 years agoYes russia stronker than capitalist scum
6.9 years ago@Awsomur Rey dies.
6.9 years agoA Rocket obviously!
6.9 years agoHello, Sir Walrus.
6.9 years agoSure why not.
6.9 years agotips hat m'laysia
6.9 years ago@GINGER01 oh yes
6.9 years ago@BaconEggs yeah having a first person view is nice. Obviously the devs are not going to make it like KSP
7.0 years ago