Go to Development>Suggestions. There will be a button that says "New suggestion". Before you make a new suggestion, make sure there aren't any similar ones. If there already is a suggestion that is the same as our similar to what you want to suggest, up vote that one and do not post a new suggestion.
@SupremeDorian maybe, but I just thought it was funny that the day after Pedro told someone to make a suggestion, he gets rid of our ability to make suggestions.
IMO, sr2 is all you need because it's easier to build and has a much bigger area to explore. However, I would still buy sp because the sp website has pretty much any plane you could ever ask for, and there's combat.
Airplane has a PID for roll, and is oriented horizontally. Rocket does not have a PID for roll, and is oriented vertically. The PIDs are also set to different values that work better depending on what you're going for. You can have an "airplane" go into space
Well that depends. On a vacuum engine you will want maximum nozzle length and minimum nozzle throat size. For chamber pressure there is a sweet spot that depends on the mass of the craft and how many engines there are. You'll probably want pressure fed or electric power cycles depending on how far your craft is going. Electric for shorter distances, pressure fed for longer distances (pressure fed increases delta v but way has less thrust than electric, so plan accordingly).
Altitude engines are really hard because it depends on what target you have for them. You can have a thrust focused engine, an efficiency focused engine, or a mix of both. For a mix of both, a full flow staged is your best bet with the smallest nozzle length. Throat size and chamber pressure depend on the size and mass of your craft.
Yes, please upload the craft. I think I might have an idea of what's happening, but I will need to see it to be sure. If you don't want it to be public, just post it as unlisted and ping me in that post so that I can get to it.
@FelixFan1 @12ocketguy It's very important who wins this argument. The fate of the of SR2 depends on it!
+7 2.4 years ago- Mobile players outnumber PC players, PC players just generally make better, more detailed crafts than do mobile players.
- If you think there is a lack of aesthetically pleasing crafts that have low part counts on this website, make your own and publish them.
+5 2.8 years agoNot with the current name suggestions. We should wait until we know what the goal of the game is going to be before changing the name.
+3 2.5 years agoNP. Real life always comes first
+3 3.5 years agoIt's most likely because the center of mass is moving when you use fuel
+2 3.5 years agoYou're looking to break your own record or something?
+2 3.7 years agoIs there a way to change text color?
+2 3.7 years agoSo it does fly... Now it must fly itself
+2 3.7 years ago@YaMomzBox420 what chtite said
+2 3.7 years ago60 km
+2 3.7 years ago@Chtite451SR2 I'm building a detailed space plane with interior, so not that lol
+2 3.7 years ago😬
+2 3.8 years agoSave the satellite as a subassembly
+2 3.8 years agoGo to Development>Suggestions. There will be a button that says "New suggestion". Before you make a new suggestion, make sure there aren't any similar ones. If there already is a suggestion that is the same as our similar to what you want to suggest, up vote that one and do not post a new suggestion.
+1 1.6 years agoYou can make pistons and rotators stronger
+1 2.5 years ago@SupremeDorian maybe, but I just thought it was funny that the day after Pedro told someone to make a suggestion, he gets rid of our ability to make suggestions.
+1 2.7 years agoNot bad
+1 2.8 years agoSet roll to + or - until bank angle = x degrees then set roll to 0.
Basic concept. You'd need to make a basic PID to make it actually work.
+1 2.9 years agoThis isn't really something you need to post a forum about.
+1 3.4 years ago@JastroOne1 also, gratz on getting silver
+1 3.4 years agoVolume 2 would be awesome
+1 3.4 years agoIMO, sr2 is all you need because it's easier to build and has a much bigger area to explore. However, I would still buy sp because the sp website has pretty much any plane you could ever ask for, and there's combat.
+1 3.5 years agoKeep it up!
+1 3.5 years agoThis forum post has a bunch of cool tips for post formatting, including posting links and images.
+1 3.6 years agoNice
+1 3.6 years agoJet engines don't work under water, in my experience
+1 3.6 years agoAirplane has a PID for roll, and is oriented horizontally. Rocket does not have a PID for roll, and is oriented vertically. The PIDs are also set to different values that work better depending on what you're going for. You can have an "airplane" go into space
+1 3.6 years agoWell written
+1 3.6 years agoWelcome
+1 3.6 years agoGood luck on your uni stuff!
+1 3.7 years agoWell that depends. On a vacuum engine you will want maximum nozzle length and minimum nozzle throat size. For chamber pressure there is a sweet spot that depends on the mass of the craft and how many engines there are. You'll probably want pressure fed or electric power cycles depending on how far your craft is going. Electric for shorter distances, pressure fed for longer distances (pressure fed increases delta v but way has less thrust than electric, so plan accordingly).
Altitude engines are really hard because it depends on what target you have for them. You can have a thrust focused engine, an efficiency focused engine, or a mix of both. For a mix of both, a full flow staged is your best bet with the smallest nozzle length. Throat size and chamber pressure depend on the size and mass of your craft.
+1 3.7 years agoYes, please upload the craft. I think I might have an idea of what's happening, but I will need to see it to be sure. If you don't want it to be public, just post it as unlisted and ping me in that post so that I can get to it.
+1 3.7 years agoEnjoy your break!
+1 3.7 years ago@FSGamer you can make a black hole in the planet studio by making a celestial body with an enormous mass.
+1 3.7 years agoInfections are the worst.
+1 3.7 years ago@Arstotzka what about a part with part scale edited?
+1 3.7 years agoTry increasing the stability modifier
+1 3.7 years agoStability modifier makes connections stronger
+1 3.7 years agoOr you can manually change the angle of whatever you're trying to attach, and edit part connections once you have it in the right place.
+1 3.7 years ago@Chtite451SR2 sent you a friend request
+1 3.7 years agoWhat kind of videos would you make?
+1 3.7 years ago@Chtite451SR2 yeah I'm in the SRC
+1 3.7 years agoPeople get points because they posts things that other people like. If they don't post things that people enjoy, they don't get points.
+1 3.7 years agoSR2 is the same but way better.
+1 3.7 years agoYeah the CL-1201 would be way too big anyway.
+1 3.7 years ago@Chtite451SR2 I dunno. Up to you guys I guess.
+1 3.7 years ago@YaMomzBox420 great. Sadly, I won't be able to watch live though.
+1 3.7 years agoThat sucks
+1 3.7 years agoOuch
+1 3.7 years agoCareer mode...
+1 3.7 years ago