Regarding No. 4, I have been wanting for a while now to support multiple star systems so Juno isn't shining even when I am like 5 light years away in alpha centauri, but I imagine it'd look weird changing SOIs between for example Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B.
There is effects and damage from reentry but the re-entry effects suck and you honestly most of the time you never need a heat shield or even get effects because the speed is slow when de-orbiting.
As for plume damage, that isn't a thing. Although in the new release engines will be able to overheat.
@FelixFan1 I myself have a MacBook Air I use. It isn’t high end or anything and I don’t play SR2 on it.
My phone is a specially stronger processing phone and can process more games like SR2 to the point where I can run max physics and graphics. So I can’t represent the entire mobile community. But generally 1000+ parts starts to alter the performance in harsh ways for phones other than mine.
Errrrr no. IMO This is something better for MMO games where you can interact with other players. It doesn’t fit the genre of SimpleRockets-2, a single player space sandbox game. Like imagine Call of Duty players being able to do emotes in the Champaign. Its kinda strange. And it’s not like sr2 players are going to always be making montage videos or something.
Good mod idea, bad stock game idea. Just like weapons. Weapons don’t fit the genre of SR2 but there is a mod.
So you mean like having eclipses be actually possible in this game?
+1 3.1 years agoNebra arguably gets you the best views in the system. It's cool seeing Urados in the sky on taurus too.
+1 3.1 years agoRegarding No. 4, I have been wanting for a while now to support multiple star systems so Juno isn't shining even when I am like 5 light years away in alpha centauri, but I imagine it'd look weird changing SOIs between for example Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B.
+1 3.1 years ago“The beta is full”
+1 3.2 years ago@AnormalSR2User Explosion scale actually wouldn’t be a bad idea. It would promote creativity in weaponry builds.
+1 3.2 years ago@GSpaceAeronauticle better than those pesky 7.7 mils
+1 3.2 years agowork some more on Juno System Overhaul? i'd like to possibly see some more from that.
+1 3.3 years agoThere is effects and damage from reentry but the re-entry effects suck and you honestly most of the time you never need a heat shield or even get effects because the speed is slow when de-orbiting.
As for plume damage, that isn't a thing. Although in the new release engines will be able to overheat.
+1 3.3 years agoBrooo thx for overload
+1 3.3 years agoYeah there are a lot of dark sides to the community. The largest server for SR2, SRC, is awful.
+1 3.3 years ago@FelixFan1 I myself have a MacBook Air I use. It isn’t high end or anything and I don’t play SR2 on it.
My phone is a specially stronger processing phone and can process more games like SR2 to the point where I can run max physics and graphics. So I can’t represent the entire mobile community. But generally 1000+ parts starts to alter the performance in harsh ways for phones other than mine.
+1 3.3 years ago@Staticalliam7 sounds like the game is bad
+1 3.3 years agoErrrrr no. IMO This is something better for MMO games where you can interact with other players. It doesn’t fit the genre of SimpleRockets-2, a single player space sandbox game. Like imagine Call of Duty players being able to do emotes in the Champaign. Its kinda strange. And it’s not like sr2 players are going to always be making montage videos or something.
Good mod idea, bad stock game idea. Just like weapons. Weapons don’t fit the genre of SR2 but there is a mod.
+1 3.4 years agobuild whatever you want. rockets ideally, but you can make all kinds of things in this game.
+1 3.4 years agowait what if you made a vizzy program to land the superheavy booster into chopsticks :hmmmm:
+1 3.4 years agofirefly aerospace
+1 3.4 years agoits a modifier that modifies stability
+1 3.4 years ago@DrexxVolv Ya. They seemed biased on chaotic's side so for some reason he isn't banned.
+1 3.4 years ago@OmniExplorationDivision ¯_(ツ)_/¯
+1 3.4 years agoDunno. I do stupid things a lot.
@Staticalliam7 analyze the endurance's spin
+1 3.4 years ago@SmurfResearchX Yeah. Children (based off what I think) are attracted by screenshots that are taken really well.
+1 3.4 years ago@Toad transgender flag. -_-
+1 3.4 years agoeverywhere I look
+1 3.4 years agoi see rideshare accounts
also news flash: 2021 no longer is a thing
@DareDevilSpaceAgency the 69 updoots is no more :(((
+1 3.5 years agoYeah habitable exomoons are cooler
+1 3.5 years agoSo. Many. ISpace companies….
+1 3.5 years agohoci pucc
+1 3.5 years ago@IceCraftGaming yep
+1 3.5 years agoFelix was kinda a dickhead
+1 3.5 years agoWhat @Jod said..
+1 3.5 years agoso many damn new ispacers
+1 3.6 years agoNOOOOOO
+1 3.6 years agoWhere’s my drood plushie at
+1 3.6 years ago@Staticalliam7 I agree
+1 3.6 years agolol good thing I saw this before installing gyro pods.
+1 3.6 years agoYASSSSSS
+1 3.6 years ago@GSpace Yeah np
+1 3.7 years ago@GSpace Yeah it’s just another word for that. But yes.
+1 3.7 years ago@Chtite451SR2 awesome
+1 3.7 years agoCongratulations! Let's get to 3 years! 🎉
+1 3.7 years agoTbh you are making this a larger deal than you need it to be.
+1 3.7 years ago@Starborn Yeah or go beyond light speed. Which would use a ton of fuel.
+1 3.7 years agoliterally no reason too but theoretically yes...
if you have infinite fuel.
+1 3.7 years ago@Pjork Too late by 5 days
+1 3.7 years agomake a gravatar account and sync it with the SR2 website
+1 3.7 years agoWen post???!!!!!
+1 3.7 years ago@Chtite451SR2 Same. I may just boycott any thing that isn’t iSpace.
+1 3.7 years ago@DrexxVolv Yeah. It also messed up the online school I was doing
+1 3.7 years ago🙄
@DrexxVolv Hey. My internet actually broke so no discord for tonight.
+1 3.7 years agoDARO, me, Chtite, and maybe DrexxVolv are militarizing against you. We are building state-of-the art war equipment.
+1 3.7 years ago