@KuiperAerospace I wish I could suggest tinkering, but as you know I am not a fan of it. What I suggest put an inlet that covers engines (or anything else going beyond the range of normal legs) and then just translating the legs downwards toward the bottom of inlet. It is simple but still looks good.
@Chtite451SR2 yeah I am too lazy to do that. Although it isn’t really that but the only reason I have gone on my computer is to do some game development. And I haven’t done much on my phone.
@iSpace @GalaxyEye kind of like my Neutron that guides itself without any aerodynamic guidance systems other than its own body. So unless a grid fin gets stuck in the wrong position it should be able to guide itself offshore, especially since the pad is near the sea.
Mass doesn’t make a difference. It is the density. If it is more dense it sinks. Else it will float. You could have one kilogram of a brick and it still sinks.
@GSpace no it didn’t. It just almost killed thousands of people on the other side without their knowledge. But it did actually reach the other side of the planet.
@Chtite451SR2 I am still trying to decide if I am going to let other manage it too. Although I think I will at least let you manage it with me since you often do manage the account better than me (I am lazy when it comes to non-aerospace topics).
@HermesEngineering would you like to make an MGD that gives out tasks dependent on what role is chosen? I could even make it so that it can do all of them itself if a role not chosen pre launch.
@YaMomzBox420 my bad on BN1. But BN3 is expected to be the one to launch SN20 to orbit. This is after they are likely to skip 18 and 19. But 16 and 17 are likely to fly. BN2 probably won’t go high. But we may see it be reused. As with the grasshopper. Due to a lot of engine problems already being solved along with more on the way BN2 may survive its first landing. Whether or not it gets caught. I am just worried about how much of a risk to the launch site catching a booster will be. If the booster comes in too fast it could completely destroy the launch tower and crane. Setting back orbital launches by more than 6 months most likely. But if they do reflux BN2 it will likely start with small hops and then maybe even go higher than New Shepard launches.
@Arstotzka but we don’t fully understand how to survive on them. And it won’t exactly go wel if the entire human race decided to show up on a planet that turns out not to be habitable like we thought.
I can be vizzy programmer
+1 3.6 years agoYou have to get 15 points to upvote. People can upvote your crafts. You just have to make stuff that people like.
+1 3.6 years ago@FlyingTraxxasRustler hey I passed you!
+1 3.6 years ago@Chtite451SR2 I think I might just build something new.
+1 3.6 years ago@Chtite451SR2 I tried that. And it almost worked! And then it folded up like mattress and exploded.
+1 3.6 years ago@KuiperAerospace I wish I could suggest tinkering, but as you know I am not a fan of it. What I suggest put an inlet that covers engines (or anything else going beyond the range of normal legs) and then just translating the legs downwards toward the bottom of inlet. It is simple but still looks good.
+1 3.6 years ago@KuiperAerospace their craft is very small and light. Very capable considering its size and weight.
+1 3.6 years ago@iSpace yep. It would make sure that everyone’s craft had ease of access to space stations, making it easier to build and maintain them.
+1 3.6 years agoBasically what @Hermes01000100 said. They are the same thing with an extra PID and a different base model.
+1 3.6 years ago?
+1 3.6 years ago@FoxtrotTheSergal @NewVistasExpeditions and may the force be with you
+1 3.7 years ago@iSpace I will be watching launches 😀
+1 3.7 years agoMay I ask what branch? (NAVY for me when the time comes)
+1 3.7 years agoYou can’t lock the nav sphere on an uncontrolled craft. I hate it but it is the only way.
+1 3.7 years ago@seventeen attaches SRBs
+1 3.7 years ago@Thesaturnaerospace plus all of the launch videos with the Falcon 9 that he copied.
+1 3.7 years agoI will join in on this
+1 3.7 years ago@seventeen it is a career mode not a SR2 copy
+1 3.7 years ago@Infinite17 that doesn’t mean they should be indefinitely strong
+1 3.7 years agoAlso they aren’t jet packs as they don’t use jets. They use hypergolic propellant similar to some RCS’.
+1 3.7 years ago@Chtite451SR2 if you want
+1 3.7 years ago@Chtite451SR2 yeah I am too lazy to do that. Although it isn’t really that but the only reason I have gone on my computer is to do some game development. And I haven’t done much on my phone.
+1 3.7 years ago@iSpace @GalaxyEye kind of like my Neutron that guides itself without any aerodynamic guidance systems other than its own body. So unless a grid fin gets stuck in the wrong position it should be able to guide itself offshore, especially since the pad is near the sea.
+1 3.7 years agoMass doesn’t make a difference. It is the density. If it is more dense it sinks. Else it will float. You could have one kilogram of a brick and it still sinks.
+1 3.7 years ago@GSpace no it didn’t. It just almost killed thousands of people on the other side without their knowledge. But it did actually reach the other side of the planet.
+1 3.7 years agoHappy April Fools! And nasa I swear if this turns out to be true I am not going to take it seriously.
+1 3.7 years ago@Infinite17 thanks! Excited for lasers the most honestly!
+1 3.7 years ago@JSO18 the current version of the Red Falcon has 552 saves lol
+1 3.7 years ago@SuperionSpaceProgram an Apple TV+ add is all that saved me
+1 3.7 years ago@YaMomzBox420 secret, secret, I’ve got a secret
+1 3.7 years agoAight I am reporting this. It is getting annoying.
+1 3.8 years ago@Infinite17 A
+1 3.8 years ago@Chtite451SR2 I am still trying to decide if I am going to let other manage it too. Although I think I will at least let you manage it with me since you often do manage the account better than me (I am lazy when it comes to non-aerospace topics).
+1 3.8 years ago@HermesEngineering would you like to make an MGD that gives out tasks dependent on what role is chosen? I could even make it so that it can do all of them itself if a role not chosen pre launch.
+1 3.8 years ago@YaMomzBox420 my bad on BN1. But BN3 is expected to be the one to launch SN20 to orbit. This is after they are likely to skip 18 and 19. But 16 and 17 are likely to fly. BN2 probably won’t go high. But we may see it be reused. As with the grasshopper. Due to a lot of engine problems already being solved along with more on the way BN2 may survive its first landing. Whether or not it gets caught. I am just worried about how much of a risk to the launch site catching a booster will be. If the booster comes in too fast it could completely destroy the launch tower and crane. Setting back orbital launches by more than 6 months most likely. But if they do reflux BN2 it will likely start with small hops and then maybe even go higher than New Shepard launches.
+1 3.8 years ago@Hannah1212 @Vedhaspace @CASXA I will test in a little bit
+1 3.8 years ago@AshtvinayakAerospace it is the International Association of Automated Rockets. Also please don’t spam. You are going to be reported next time.
+1 3.8 years ago@Arstotzka @YaMomzBox420 I can’t even look at the source code without getting a your iPhone has been hacked scam. Even on my chrome book.
+1 3.8 years ago@YaMomzBox420 I did end up finding it. It is very hard to see unless you either know where it is or are looking extremely close
+1 3.8 years agoDon’t forget about t_cd-1 mission on the 25 th
+1 3.8 years agoIf you want proof then just search up css SimpleRockets 2. Then go down to css2 (3)
+1 3.8 years agoOr it is going to be some 0 point person who used our engines and program and just attached docking ports. That would make me so mad.
+1 3.8 years agoI have been working on this for quite sometime. Unfortunately the booster crawler collapses
+1 3.8 years ago@YaMomzBox420 I am not going to do a work around with my parents. All that will happen is they check my browsing history and then bam.
+1 3.8 years ago@Nico412 under 18
+1 3.8 years ago@Arstotzka but we don’t fully understand how to survive on them. And it won’t exactly go wel if the entire human race decided to show up on a planet that turns out not to be habitable like we thought.
+1 3.8 years ago@iSpace sucks that it is delayed until then. Good luck through.
+1 3.8 years ago@SoulBlazer bathroom floods:
+1 3.8 years agoRight here looks as good a place as any
You can view a good one here. It has boosters and fairing support. Only if enabled though.
+1 3.8 years agoSmooth gravity turn out as much as possible. If the craft is unstable it will fail under extreme gravity turn conditions.
+1 3.8 years ago